ID MyHorse

The History of Equine Slaughter in the United States (Part 2 in a series)

Last week, I launched the first post in a series about the equine slaughter industry. This is not a series I planned to write. My eyes were blown open by a training module I completed as part of my veterinary continuing education requirements. In the week before Part One was posted, I crawled further and further down a rabbit hole as I spoke to countless individuals on different sides of this issue. Each door that I opened revealed several more doors to explore. To say that this is a complicated issue would be the ultimate understatement.

Before I delve into the history of equine slaughter in the United States, I want to address my personal viewpoint on this practice. Last week, I stated that I have been having conversations with Dr. Lorna Grande, a veterinarian with the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association. Lorna has taught classes on Animal Welfare. She said,

There are a lot of “Gotcha” things in the animal welfare world.

Dr. Lorna Grande, Program Director, Education and Outreach, Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association

What does she mean by that? There are two aspects to that statement.

On the one hand, she is referring to the fact that we all have our sensitivities, and we manifest them in different ways. I personally cannot fathom sending my horse to an auction, knowing the high probability of my beloved horse landing in the horse trader or slaughter pipeline. But I’m not a vegetarian! My sentiments don’t preclude me from sending cattle to a slaughterhouse. Do I want to think about that hypocrisy? No, I don’t.

The other “GOTCHA” is how people perceive or dismiss your message if they don’t agree with absolutely everything you believe. I am educating myself about this industry as much as I am trying to educate you. There are many, many variables when one is talking about “animal welfare.” Let me give you an example in the small animal world…

As one of the most dedicated dog lovers on the planet, the concept that an animal shelter would have euthanized dogs piled up in a back room just devastates me. I find breed-specific legislation abhorrent. I am an advocate of “no kill” shelters… to a point. A medically or emotionally fragile or debilitated animal, or a dangerous one, might best be served by euthanasia, rather than prolonging their physical or mental suffering.

So I guess that means I am in favor of “mostly no-kill shelters” because there would certainly be times when a dog is simply not adoptable. If they are emotionally afraid of everything and everyone, can they really have a decent quality of life? At what cost? And at what danger to the public? (See my post about Emma, my own dangerous dog.) So if you are a believer in total no-kill shelters, can you find my views and my research about equine slaughter credible?

As you read this series, there will be a multitude of twists and turns. Whereas I set out to uncover the veterinarian’s role in “regulating” this industry, I have realized that it is much, much bigger than that. Fasten your seatbelt, and try to keep an open mind about all of the information I hope to present.

My views on equine slaughter

Regardless of the fact that my eating habits subject cattle to a slaughterhouse, I am firm in my belief that horses are not livestock that should suffer the same fate. Their “fight or flight” mentality makes them extremely unsuited for a swift and painless execution in a slaughter box. This is just one aspect of this atrocity… what they experience when they finally get to Mexico or Canada.

American horses in Mexico heading to slaughter plant (Feature photo and this photo courtesy of HSUS)

The journey they must endure on the way to that disastrous endpoint is an incredible atrocity in itself. Apparently, there are recommended regulations but no one has the authority to enforce them. I am seriously conflicted about how some members of my profession are so willing and able to turn a blind eye to this suffering.

The history of equine slaughter in the United States

A Timeline of Horse Slaughter Legislation in the United States is an article written in 2012 and updated in 2014. Another great resource is The History of Horse Slaughter. Refer to these articles if you want specifics about the timeline I will share.

There were equine slaughterhouses operating in the United States until 2007. At various points in time, there were facilities in California, Texas, and Illinois. California banned the practice in the late ’90’s. The Texas and Illinois facilities continued to operate until legislation introduced in June 2005 began the process of shutting them down.

In June 2005, an amendment passed the House that prohibited funding for inspections of horses for slaughter. In September of that same year, Senator John Ensign, a Nevada veterinarian, proposed a similar amendment to the Senate. I pulled the following information from a transcript I found when he proposed the amendment. The views expressed by Senator Ensign are at the core of this entire issue.

Mr. President, I rise, along with my colleagues, Senators BYRD, LANDRIEU, GRAHAM, LOTT, STABENOW, DEMINT, FEINSTEIN, and LAUTENBERG, to submit an amendment to the 2006 Senate Agriculture appropriations bill.

The goal of our amendment is simple: to end the slaughter of America’s horses for human consumption overseas.

I graduated from Colorado State with a degree in veterinary medicine. I have been concerned with animal welfare since my earlier days as a youth and pursued those interests as a practicing veterinarian.

Our Nation’s history and cultural heritage is strongly associated with horses. George Washington is pictured many places with horses. We are reminded of the legend of Paul Revere’s ride and the Pony Express in the West. The Depression era race between Seabiscuit and War Admiral raised the morale of our country during desperate times.

The owners who sell their horses at auction are often unaware that those horses may be on their way to one of the three remaining horse slaughterhouses in America. These slaughterhouses–two in Texas and one in Illinois–are owned by French and Belgium companies. They slaughter American horses almost exclusively for one purpose– exporting the meat overseas for human consumption.

Workhorses, racehorses, and even pet horses–many young and healthy– are slaughtered for human consumption in Europe and Asia, where their meat is considered a delicacy. The profits, along with the product, are shipped overseas. These horses are slaughtered in America and shipped to Japan, France, Belgium, Italy, Germany for human consumption.

Last year, nearly 100,000 American horses were slaughtered for human consumption overseas. Sixty-five thousand of these were sent to three slaughterhouses in the United States, and more than 30,000 were shipped across our borders to Canada and Mexico for slaughter.

Our amendment effectively stops this practice. It restricts the use of Federal funds for the inspection of horses being sent to slaughterhouses for human consumption. Without these inspections, required under the Federal Meat Inspection Act, horses cannot be slaughtered, or exported for slaughter, for human consumption overseas.

Dr. Ensign believed that stopping inspections would stop the slaughter. He was wrong. In February 2006, a bill was passed that allowed the slaughterhouses to pay for their own inspections. In March 2007, that loophole was closed. That same month, the Texas facility closed due to community pressure, in addition to the increasing hassle of operating the plant. The Illinois plant fought to stay open but lost its battle in September of that year.

In November 2011, the agriculture appropriations bill for 2012 was passed without any wording that prohibited the funding of horse inspections for slaughter. In January 2014, President Obama signed into law a bill that once again prohibited funding for equine slaughter inspections.

From 2014 until the end of 2021

Every year between 2014 and 2020, a Federal bill titled Safeguard America’s Food Exports has been presented to Congress. The acronym is, of course, SAFE and the bill would have made the slaughter of equines illegal both at home and abroad. It has enjoyed widespread bipartisan support but has never been passed. It begs the question, Why?

In May 2021, a bill named Save America’s Forgotten Equines (SAFE) was introduced to the House. It also prohibited the slaughter of American horses both domestically and internationally. More on that shortly…

In June of the same year, an amendment to a Federal transportation bill prohibited the movement of horses intended for slaughter over state or national borders. It passed unanimously in the House but never made it to the Senate.

In December 2021, the New York Governor signed a bill that prohibited New York racehorses and breeding stock from being sold to slaughter for the purposes of human consumption.

June of 2022

The SAFE Act was initially introduced in May 2021. In June of that year, a House subcommittee unanimously approved it. Apparently, it made it to a committee where it subsequently died.

I have learned from a great deal of research as well as personal conversations that both the AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association) and AAEP (American Association of Equine Practitioners) oppose this legislation. I had a long conversation with Keith Kleine, Director of Industry Relations for AAEP. He is not a veterinarian. He stated that AVMA and AAEP are “opposed to the legislation because of unintended consequences.” He continued by stating:

If new legislation is introduced and it is similar to previous bills, it is likely to be opposed.

Keith Kleine, AAEP Director of Industry Relations

I asked the direct question, “What is AAEP doing to address this issue?” Keith responded, “AAEP continues to work with agencies providing resources for proper transportation and care. There is information available to shippers, state agencies, APHIS, and State animal health officials. We spend time on the proactive part instead of opposition… we partner with ASPCA to provide the Vet Direct Safety Net and direct resources for individuals. We invest in trying to better educate owners and make them more responsible. We support and invest in programs and nonprofits providing resources for adoption and better care.”

One of my final questions revolved around whether or not AAEP had any plans to reconsider their position or explore how this is actually playing out in the real world. He responded, “We are not an enforcement agency… when other issues come to the forfront that we need to address and that have priority, we do.” I interpreted that to mean that the suffering of horses subjected to slaughter is not a priority issue that they intend to address.

So… it begs the question… Why did this bill die after reaching a committee? Is it possible that lobbyists for AVMA and AAEP had something to do with its demise? Perhaps they do spend some time in opposition? If I were a legislator, I would lend a considerable amount of credibility to the AVMA or the AAEP. If those premier organizations don’t believe in the bill, why would a less-invested and less-educated-about-the-topic legislator?

According to Mr. Kleine, 75% of the AAEP membership agrees with their position. I have followed up our initial conversation with some email questions, including what percentage of their membership responded? How did they conduct this poll? I should also note that, although I reached out to the AVMA, they have not returned my call.

American Quarter Horse Association position

Rather than just give the AVMA and AAEP all the “credit”, lets look at the official American Quarter Horse Association position:

AQHA opposes abolishing the option of horse processing until there are other provisions to take care of more than 150,000 horses that meet that end each year.  Consistent with positions established by the American Association of Equine Practitioners and American Veterinary Medical Association, AQHA supports the humane, USDA supervised end-of-life process as a much better option than starvation, neglect or inhumane treatment inside or outside of the United States.

To date, no proposed state or federal law has addressed funding of care for unwanted horses, long-term placement of affected horses or established guidelines for standards of care at retirement and rescue facilities. Failing to address these core issues adversely affects the welfare of horses.

Additionally, horses as livestock are personal property protected under the United States Constitution. Any law that would result in “taking” of personal property without just compensation or valid purpose is a violation of an individual’s constitutional rights. Furthermore, it is a violation of the Commerce Clause to unreasonably restrict interstate trade of property.

Therefore, AQHA continues to oppose the provisions of state or federal legislation intended to: (a) prohibit the humane end-of-life processing of horses; and (b) prohibit the humane transport of horses that may be destined to processing plants.” 

Let’s look at the numbers!

Mr. Kleine from the AAEP provided me with the most recent statistics related to the number of horses sent to slaughter. As of June 2022, 1022 horses had been shipped to Canada. The total for all of 2021 was 5139, and for 2019 it was 10,486.

Mexico’s numbers are higher:

Provided by US Mexico livestock trade Ag marketing services USDA

There are so many things wrong with that statement from AQHA. First, let’s check their numbers. Do the statistics above support the statement that “more than 150,000 horses” are being slaughtered every year? Second, do they really think that this is a “humane, USDA supervised end-of-life process“? If you haven’t already, read Part One of this series where I describe the apparent lack of veterinary regulation on this industry! These horses are nothumanely slaughtered” OR “humanely transported”.

Equine slaughter
Undercover investigation of Juarez Mexico Horse Slaughter at Rastro Municipal Horse Slaughter Plant, Juarez, Mexico. (Photo credit to the HSUS)

The number has diminished to the point that AVMA, AAEP, and AQHA’s position about “unintended consequences” is questionable. “What will happen to all of these horses?” they cry. It seems totally feasible that these “unwanted” horses could be absorbed within the current equine community.

A Press Release from the Humane Society Legislative Fund

The Humane Society Legislative Fund (HSLF) published a Press Release in December 2022. More than 200 veterinarians express support for legislation to permanently end the slaughter of American horses. In another publication by HSLF, they state that The Save America’s Forgotten Equines (SAFE) Act (HR 3355/S 2732), would permanently ban domestic horse slaughter in the U.S. and stop the export of American horses for slaughter abroad — practices that 80% of Americans support banning.

The Save America’s Forgotten Equines (SAFE) Act (HR 3355/S 2732), would permanently ban domestic horse slaughter in the U.S. and stop the export of American horses for slaughter abroad — practices that 80% of Americans support banning.

Humane Society Legislative Fund

I encourage you to follow the link above and read the HSLF Press Release. Dr. Lorna Grande is quoted as saying:

“The slaughter of American horses for human consumption in foreign markets continues to exist mostly to accommodate industry participants who exploit horses for money and prestige. Shipping horses, who are naturally skittish, long distances in packed trailers to a slaughterhouse where they will be crowded together in chutes to be pushed toward their death is the antithesis of humane euthanasia,” said Dr. Lorna Grande, program director for advocacy and outreach for the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association. “Horses deserve better. Greedy industries will continue to take advantage of slaughter as long as this easy, out of sight, out of mind ‘disposal’ exists.”

Dr. Lorna Grande

I simply do not understand how the AQHA can publicly declare that this is a humane and reasonable approach to reduce the domestic equine population. Perhaps they know more than Dr. Nicholas Dodman, a founding member of Veterinarians for Equine Welfare and one of the world’s most noted and celebrated veterinary behaviorists.

It is the united professional opinion of the members of VEW that horse slaughter is inhumane, and that it is an unacceptable way to end a horse’s life under any circumstance. One need only observe horse slaughter to see that it is a far cry from genuine humane euthanasia. From the transport of horses on inappropriate conveyances for long periods of time without food, water or rest – to the very ugly slaughter process in which horses react with pain and fear, no evidence exists to support the claim that horse slaughter is a form of humane euthanasia. Rather, it is a brutal process that results in very tangible and easily observable equine suffering.

Dr. Nicholas Dodman (see the full transcript here)

In the interest of fairness, I must state that I don’t know how HSLF conducted their poll that determined that 80% of Americans oppose domestic horse slaughter… but I don’t doubt their statistic. I do wonder how 75% of equine veterinarians believe that banning a practice which currently has limited or absent veterinary oversight and which clearly is a devastating experience for a horse can be an appropriate position.

What’s next?

Again, let me reiiterate that this series is taking on a life of its own. I have learned the following facts about this incredibly complicated and under-the-radar industry:

  • Did you know that some breeders use slaughter as a means of disposing of unwanted horses? I heard about one breeder that had a “junk pasture.” She threw what she didn’t want on a lush pasture to fatten them up, and then off they went to Canada. I had no idea that a breeder would do that…
  • Did you know that some highly visible equine rescues practice “bait and switch”? They post photos of horses they think will get the social media community to cough up the dollars, and then they don’t even bid on those horses. True, sometimes a horse they intend to bid on “gets away”… but other times they never intend to buy a horse they photographed. I didn’t know that… and I will be addressing this in a future blog, with suggestions on how to do your own “due diligence” to evaluate the legitimacy of a rescue organization.
  • Did you know that only a few people have a contract to purchase horses for slaughter, and everyone else in the pipeline is a middleman? The quotas are small enough that actual kill buyers want the horses fat enough to bring some money. The highly debilitated ones end up on the webpages of horse brokers with the decree that “This horse will be sold to slaughter if you don’t rescue it right now!” It is a cottage industry built on the slaughter industry. A great deal of horse brokering raises a whole lot of money for these middlemen. I didn’t know that…

Stay tuned for a much deeper education.

Like this post? Please share!

4 thoughts on “The History of Equine Slaughter in the United States (Part 2 in a series)”

  1. this is great watching a veterinarian do the research that we have come to all learn sooner or later. You take the view from your profession and have access we do not have. We did not know the loophole that the rules about transport were unenforceable because we don’t sit at the learning modules like you do. ANOTHER dirty little secret which keeps this predatory industry alive. This makes so much sense on why Kill buyers smile their oily smiles and say they will ship them anyway. The laws and lack of accountability have made their power greater than ours. AQHA makes millions in registries every year. They need foals born and they need their horses to die so they can make more. It is that simple and greed-minded. Quarter horses are one of the most common breeds in kill pens. Horses in our Hands is currently doing another vet focused poll whereby over 1,000 veterinarians are against horse slaughter, so vets are standing up. I think so many people get threatened if they stand up against this awful slaughter business. You wouldn’t believe the stories I hear about, well I would stand against this but my business would suffer. What? Do we live in a mob type country? Where are our freedoms to do the right thing?
    Many people also do NOT want to spend the money on humane euthanasia. If a horse is lame or needs a medical procedure done, they would rather get paid by dumping the horse easily and using their money to buy another horse. Yep, we pay people to be irresponsible and the horse suffers. Also the person who buys the horse not knowing the real issue suffers when their horse has a medical issue that has gone on for too long and now needs severe medical help or in some cases it is too late. The horse could have been helped months or years ago. Don’t get me started on Auction issues. Kill buyers are often the auction house’s biggest customer so who gets preference on a bid? Many rescuers or would be buyers are ignored if a kill buyer wants that horse. We’ve seen so many “mishaps” it is almost funny except it is tragic for the horse. Some auctions go so late into the next morning. Do you want to stay at an auction till 2 a.m? Not likely. Many kill buyers have even bought auction houses to get money on every avenue. So here’s a question that lands right in your lap, why aren’t vets reporting all the abuse in the kill pens? When rescuers go to kill pens they are horrified at all the horses in various stages of injury, bleeding and broken bones. Starvation and horses bullied into not getting food by aggressive horses are common. How is this allowed? Probably goes back to that paying off, bribery, turn their eyes away, ignore it or be threatened greed. Anyway, thank you for doing this whole series. We need to get the word out to animal welfare people. Most the horse industry accepts this and calls it a necessary evil over and over. You can argue with facts and they don’t want to see it. We have given up on convincing them and are turning to people who care about animals. Yes, there are horse people who care, but out of the 2 million horse owners so few fight and want to bring slaughter back to the USA. No there is no way to humanely slaughter horses, that is why it was defunded here years ago. There is a USDA report they did on all the abuses of horses here in the USA slaughter plants. It needs to go away forever here, Mexico and Canada. Our largest fight is getting the word out to the 80% of Americans who are anti slaughter. The media is paid off etc. We can’t seem to break this mob type barrier to get the truth out.

  2. Oh and Native American Tribes are against the safe act as well. You’ll see that this is the way these predators are trying to bring slaughter back to the USA by bringing in slaughter plants to the reservations. One story says the Indians are wanting this, another story says that they are being coerced by big corporations. Ranchers need wild horses gone so they can have cheap lands to graze their cattle and make money (so you can see how being a meat eater or one who wants grass fed cows comes back to bite us). Large corporations also want the minerals that are in OUR public lands to put into the new phones and cars they make and again the wild horses and other wild animals are in their way of making more money. Consumers need to know how their new gadget affects animals and subsequently our life as they remove more and more of nature to make way for an unbalanced eco system. Which again affects us. We are not good at long term thinking for the next generation, nor slowing down to find a peaceful, humane solution

  3. Another great article, and thank you once again Karen for some cogent comments! I was going to go off on my rant against the AQHA, but you expressed the same ideas better than I could.
    In your comment on the previous article, you encouraged a national system of microchipping, similar to what they do in the EU. They also require “Equine passports” tied to their microchip and updated by a vet every time they are seen, including for routine care like vaccinations. USA horses who travel overseas for competitions are required to have these, and I would argue that all horses should have this so that every horse’s history stays with it no matter where goes, and any gap in care shows who is accountable.
    Of course, the American public would never stand for this, unfortunately, because accountability would require hated government oversight. However, another practice that’s common in the EU that might be accepted by the American public, might be breeding inspections.
    Imagine if the AQHA did this! Currently any old horse bred in the backyard with two AQHA parents can be registered AQHA, regardless of their genetic diseases, lack of training or poor conformation. Breeding inspections could refuse to register horses with genetic conditions such as HYPP, OLWS, and GBED, plus participating in the inspection process itself would necessitate a basic level of training.
    There’s a reason why Americans who aspire to International sport horse competitions (and even amateurs who can afford it and want horses with sports ability without unpleasant surprises) prefer horses imported from the EU. And, with Western sports becoming part of the FEI and starting to become more popular in the EU, it wouldn’t surprise me if registries like the FEQHA and DQHA, who do their due diligence unlike the AQHA, end up exporting their horses here. The AQHA is going to destroy itself with their greed.

    1. Very excellent points as well. I don’t remember if I wrote this fact in one of the previous posts.but registration of new foals dropped by 60% after the DeKalb slaughter plant closed. That’s because all of the the prolific and unaccountable breeding stopped to some extent when they no longer had the Slaughter pipeline as a resource. The more I learn about AQHA involvement in the slaughter industry and over breeding and irresponsible horse ownership,the more disgusted I get.

Leave a Reply

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial

Enjoy this blog? Share it with your friends!